天津

集团 北京 上海 广州 沈阳 深圳 南京 苏州 宁波 成都 武汉 西安 南通 长沙 长春 济南 青岛 昆明 重庆 加盟校区 查找更多校区>>
来环球,去全球!
400-999-9090 雅思考试官方合作伙伴
代码:TS000170
您所在的位置: 首页 > 考前解析
考前解析

2017年3月25日托福写作考前解析

2017-03-22

来源:环球教育

小编:长安 98
摘要:

  环球教育(原环球教育)教研中心为大家带来的“2017年3月25日托福写作考前解析”,希望对大家有所帮助!托福考试预测和真题回忆均由环球教育教研中心供稿,转载请注明出处

  独立写作

  1.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All school teachers should be required to take courses every five years to update their knowledge.

  Every subject is constantly developing with the forefront being renewed on a yearly basis, so it is believed that teachers should update their knowledge accordingly. However, asking the teachers to take courses every five years would be inadvisable, since it would be unnecessary for teachers at certain levels of education.

  To begin with, it would clearly be quite unnecessary for the primary school teachers, since they only offer basic knowledge, which seldom changes in five years. For example, the basic calculation principles have never changed since they were invented; the basic grammatical rules have also remained almost the same for centuries. Teachers of these subjects obviously do not need to update their knowledge of the subject they are teaching every five years. Besides, subjects such as music and PE are all the more stable, with almost no requirement on new knowledge.

  A first sight, it would seem necessary for university professors as they usually have to keep themselves informed of the forefront of their own fields of study. However, the fact is that professors and lecturers attend conferences or seminars, and read newly-published academic articles themselves so as to keep up with the latest development of their field. Taking courses would only waste their time and impair the academic freedom. These teachers would spontaneously seek out information about their field regularly, so it would be unwise to force them to take courses at too long an interval.

  In fact, among teachers of different levels of education, only middle school teachers might find it necessary to take such courses. This is because the syllabus and test forms may change regularly and if they are not familiar with the modifications, they may fail to enhance the academic performance of their students. For example, middle school teachers should be fully aware of the reform in SAT writing and teach the students the new skills required; otherwise, their students might be wrongly instructed and score too low in the test, failing to get enrolled in top-notch universities. More often than not, the changes in the syllabus and test forms are subtle but complicated, so assembling the teachers and giving them instructions would lead to a most satisfactory result. In this way, the education bureau can make sure that every teacher understands the changes and that they can teach students more effectively.

  In conclusion, although teachers do have to update their knowledge, it is not necessary to require teachers of all levels to take courses every five years.

  内容较多,以上仅为部分

  >>查看托福写作预测完整版

有规划 更自信

1V1免费课程规划指导