天津

集团 北京 上海 广州 沈阳 深圳 南京 苏州 宁波 成都 武汉 西安 南通 长沙 长春 济南 青岛 昆明 重庆 加盟校区 查找更多校区>>
来环球,去全球!
022-5837-8200 雅思考试官方合作伙伴
代码:TS000170
您所在的位置: 首页 > 备考指南 > 雅思备考 > 雅思写作
雅思写作

2017年9月16日雅思写作新题详解

2017-09-20

来源:环球教育

小编:长安 370
摘要:

  9月16日的雅思写作考试又是一个在老题的基础上稍加改动的题目,环球教育杨亮老师希望不要有考生被之前备考阶段的老题牵绊,否则本题还是会有偏题概率的。

  其实,只要考生在审题阶段注意了题目之中的极端词,在后续的写作中应该不会有太大难度。毕竟政府是否该投资艺术的这类问题,较为常见不算陌生。


  原题如下:

  Some people think any governmental money spent on supporting artists (e.g. musicians, poets and painters) can be better used for other more important things. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 20170909

  审题阶段应该注意极端词any。

  Every time after releasing some financial plans, governments will expectedly receive plenty of criticism. Some radical critics show their feeling of dissatisfaction, pointing out that any sort of financial aid for artists is waste of money. Without a shadow of doubt their attitude is definitely harebrained.

  开头段,较为简短。在背景介绍之后,引出了题目,既全文讨论的重点。本段最后一句表明了笔者的立场。

  Primarily, there is no gainsaying that art plays an irreplaceable role in people’s life, with improving aesthetics standard of the public, showing diverse cultures of a nation and expressing artists’ philosophy. All those positive influence of art have immediate causality with governmental fund for supporting artists.

  主段一,首先强调了艺术的重要性。而后,强调了艺术创作和政府的财务支持之间存在非常直接的因果关系。本段的功能是引出下文。

  Assuming there were a country where artists could never get any financial support from governments, they had to spare enough time and energy on making a living. As we all know, artistic creation is both time- and energy-consuming. This is to say, in the country like this, artists would all become less productive, so that diversity and quality of work of art would not be guaranteed. Worse still, for earning a better living, some artists would create works of art to cater to the demand of market since selling their products would be the only purpose of composing a song or writing a poem. Their artwork might be sold at high prices, but artistic value of their work would unquestionably drop sharply.

  上一段引出了本段。上一段结尾强调了政府财务支持和艺术创作之间是有必然联系的。而本段就是在讨论其联系的原因。通过反正的方式,强调了没有政府的财务支持艺术家就不会顺利地进行艺术创作。

  Briefly, in most cases governments ought not to give fund for artists priority, as obviously there are a great number of aspects much more emergent like money for coping with some livelihood issues. Nevertheless, this does imply that necessarily economic aid for artists can be ignored.

  结尾段,首先说明政府对于艺术家的财务支持肯定不会是政府财务支出中最为重要的部分。但是,这并不代表一些必要的基本性的财务支持也可以被忽略。其实这个结论就是针对题干中的极端词any。

  成文仓促,多有不足,欢迎斧正。

有规划 更自信

1V1免费课程规划指导